state-res: Calculate auth_events and fix bug when calculating common events
This commit is contained in:
parent
b8c54d8e2b
commit
17afbabd92
@ -1,5 +1,9 @@
|
||||
# [unreleased]
|
||||
|
||||
Breaking changes:
|
||||
|
||||
* state_res::resolve now doesn't take auth_events anymore and calculates it on its own instead
|
||||
|
||||
# 0.2.0
|
||||
|
||||
Breaking changes:
|
||||
|
@ -66,15 +66,7 @@ fn resolution_shallow_auth_chain(c: &mut Criterion) {
|
||||
&room_id(),
|
||||
&RoomVersionId::Version6,
|
||||
&state_sets,
|
||||
state_sets
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.map(|map| {
|
||||
store
|
||||
.auth_event_ids(&room_id(), &map.values().cloned().collect::<Vec<_>>())
|
||||
.unwrap()
|
||||
})
|
||||
.collect(),
|
||||
&|id| ev_map.get(id).map(Arc::clone),
|
||||
|id| ev_map.get(id).map(Arc::clone),
|
||||
) {
|
||||
Ok(state) => state,
|
||||
Err(e) => panic!("{}", e),
|
||||
@ -89,7 +81,7 @@ fn resolve_deeper_event_set(c: &mut Criterion) {
|
||||
let ban = BAN_STATE_SET();
|
||||
|
||||
inner.extend(ban);
|
||||
let store = TestStore(inner.clone());
|
||||
let _store = TestStore(inner.clone());
|
||||
|
||||
let state_set_a = [
|
||||
inner.get(&event_id("CREATE")).unwrap(),
|
||||
@ -123,15 +115,7 @@ fn resolve_deeper_event_set(c: &mut Criterion) {
|
||||
&room_id(),
|
||||
&RoomVersionId::Version6,
|
||||
&state_sets,
|
||||
state_sets
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.map(|map| {
|
||||
store
|
||||
.auth_event_ids(&room_id(), &map.values().cloned().collect::<Vec<_>>())
|
||||
.unwrap()
|
||||
})
|
||||
.collect(),
|
||||
&|id| inner.get(id).map(Arc::clone),
|
||||
|id| inner.get(id).map(Arc::clone),
|
||||
) {
|
||||
Ok(state) => state,
|
||||
Err(_) => panic!("resolution failed during benchmarking"),
|
||||
|
@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ use std::{
|
||||
sync::Arc,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
use itertools::Itertools;
|
||||
use maplit::btreeset;
|
||||
use ruma_common::MilliSecondsSinceUnixEpoch;
|
||||
use ruma_events::{
|
||||
@ -14,7 +15,7 @@ use ruma_events::{
|
||||
EventType,
|
||||
};
|
||||
use ruma_identifiers::{EventId, RoomId, RoomVersionId};
|
||||
use tracing::{debug, info, warn};
|
||||
use tracing::{debug, info, trace, warn};
|
||||
|
||||
mod error;
|
||||
pub mod event_auth;
|
||||
@ -45,9 +46,6 @@ impl StateResolution {
|
||||
/// * `state_sets` - The incoming state to resolve. Each `StateMap` represents a possible fork
|
||||
/// in the state of a room.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// * `auth_events` - The full recursive set of `auth_events` for each event in the
|
||||
/// `state_sets`.
|
||||
///
|
||||
/// * `fetch_event` - Any event not found in the `event_map` will defer to this closure to find
|
||||
/// the event.
|
||||
///
|
||||
@ -60,7 +58,6 @@ impl StateResolution {
|
||||
room_id: &RoomId,
|
||||
room_version: &RoomVersionId,
|
||||
state_sets: &[StateMap<EventId>],
|
||||
auth_events: Vec<Vec<EventId>>,
|
||||
fetch_event: F,
|
||||
) -> Result<StateMap<EventId>>
|
||||
where
|
||||
@ -72,22 +69,43 @@ impl StateResolution {
|
||||
// Split non-conflicting and conflicting state
|
||||
let (clean, conflicting) = StateResolution::separate(state_sets);
|
||||
|
||||
info!("non conflicting {:?}", clean.len());
|
||||
info!("non conflicting events: {}", clean.len());
|
||||
trace!("{:?}", clean);
|
||||
|
||||
if conflicting.is_empty() {
|
||||
info!("no conflicting state found");
|
||||
return Ok(clean);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
info!("{} conflicting events", conflicting.len());
|
||||
info!("conflicting events: {}", conflicting.len());
|
||||
debug!("{:?}", conflicting);
|
||||
|
||||
let mut iter = conflicting.values();
|
||||
let mut conflicting_state_sets = iter
|
||||
.next()
|
||||
.expect("we made sure conflicting is not empty")
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.map(|o| if let Some(e) = o { btreeset![e.clone()] } else { BTreeSet::new() })
|
||||
.collect::<Vec<_>>();
|
||||
|
||||
for events in iter {
|
||||
for i in 0..events.len() {
|
||||
// This is okay because all vecs have the same length = number of states
|
||||
if let Some(e) = &events[i] {
|
||||
conflicting_state_sets[i].insert(e.clone());
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// The set of auth events that are not common across server forks
|
||||
let mut auth_diff = StateResolution::get_auth_chain_diff(room_id, &auth_events)?;
|
||||
|
||||
debug!("auth diff size {:?}", auth_diff);
|
||||
let mut auth_diff =
|
||||
StateResolution::get_auth_chain_diff(room_id, &conflicting_state_sets, &fetch_event)?;
|
||||
|
||||
// Add the auth_diff to conflicting now we have a full set of conflicting events
|
||||
auth_diff.extend(conflicting.values().cloned().flatten());
|
||||
auth_diff.extend(conflicting.values().cloned().flatten().filter_map(|o| o));
|
||||
|
||||
debug!("auth diff: {}", auth_diff.len());
|
||||
trace!("{:?}", auth_diff);
|
||||
|
||||
// `all_conflicted` contains unique items
|
||||
// synapse says `full_set = {eid for eid in full_conflicted_set if eid in event_map}`
|
||||
@ -97,7 +115,8 @@ impl StateResolution {
|
||||
let all_conflicted =
|
||||
auth_diff.into_iter().filter(|id| fetch_event(id).is_some()).collect::<BTreeSet<_>>();
|
||||
|
||||
info!("full conflicted set is {} events", all_conflicted.len());
|
||||
info!("full conflicted set: {}", all_conflicted.len());
|
||||
debug!("{:?}", all_conflicted);
|
||||
|
||||
// We used to check that all events are events from the correct room
|
||||
// this is now a check the caller of `resolve` must make.
|
||||
@ -116,7 +135,8 @@ impl StateResolution {
|
||||
&fetch_event,
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
debug!("SRTD {:?}", sorted_control_levels);
|
||||
debug!("sorted control events: {}", sorted_control_levels.len());
|
||||
trace!("{:?}", sorted_control_levels);
|
||||
|
||||
let room_version = RoomVersion::new(room_version)?;
|
||||
// Sequentially auth check each control event.
|
||||
@ -127,7 +147,8 @@ impl StateResolution {
|
||||
&fetch_event,
|
||||
)?;
|
||||
|
||||
debug!("AUTHED {:?}", resolved_control.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>());
|
||||
debug!("resolved control events: {}", resolved_control.len());
|
||||
trace!("{:?}", resolved_control);
|
||||
|
||||
// At this point the control_events have been resolved we now have to
|
||||
// sort the remaining events using the mainline of the resolved power level.
|
||||
@ -141,17 +162,18 @@ impl StateResolution {
|
||||
.cloned()
|
||||
.collect::<Vec<_>>();
|
||||
|
||||
debug!("LEFT {:?}", events_to_resolve.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>());
|
||||
debug!("events left to resolve: {}", events_to_resolve.len());
|
||||
trace!("{:?}", events_to_resolve);
|
||||
|
||||
// This "epochs" power level event
|
||||
let power_event = resolved_control.get(&(EventType::RoomPowerLevels, "".into()));
|
||||
|
||||
debug!("PL {:?}", power_event);
|
||||
debug!("power event: {:?}", power_event);
|
||||
|
||||
let sorted_left_events =
|
||||
StateResolution::mainline_sort(&events_to_resolve, power_event, &fetch_event);
|
||||
|
||||
debug!("SORTED LEFT {:?}", sorted_left_events.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>());
|
||||
trace!("events left, sorted: {:?}", sorted_left_events.iter().collect::<Vec<_>>());
|
||||
|
||||
let mut resolved_state = StateResolution::iterative_auth_check(
|
||||
&room_version,
|
||||
@ -174,9 +196,7 @@ impl StateResolution {
|
||||
/// that none of the other have this is a conflicting event.
|
||||
pub fn separate(
|
||||
state_sets: &[StateMap<EventId>],
|
||||
) -> (StateMap<EventId>, StateMap<Vec<EventId>>) {
|
||||
use itertools::Itertools;
|
||||
|
||||
) -> (StateMap<EventId>, StateMap<Vec<Option<EventId>>>) {
|
||||
info!("separating {} sets of events into conflicted/unconflicted", state_sets.len());
|
||||
|
||||
let mut unconflicted_state = StateMap::new();
|
||||
@ -184,16 +204,14 @@ impl StateResolution {
|
||||
|
||||
for key in state_sets.iter().flat_map(|map| map.keys()).unique() {
|
||||
let mut event_ids =
|
||||
state_sets.iter().map(|state_set| state_set.get(key)).unique().collect::<Vec<_>>();
|
||||
state_sets.iter().map(|state_set| state_set.get(key)).collect::<Vec<_>>();
|
||||
|
||||
if event_ids.len() == 1 {
|
||||
if event_ids.iter().all_equal() {
|
||||
let id = event_ids.remove(0).expect("unconflicting `EventId` is not None");
|
||||
unconflicted_state.insert(key.clone(), id.clone());
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
conflicted_state.insert(
|
||||
key.clone(),
|
||||
event_ids.into_iter().flatten().cloned().collect::<Vec<_>>(),
|
||||
);
|
||||
conflicted_state
|
||||
.insert(key.clone(), event_ids.into_iter().map(|o| o.cloned()).collect());
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -201,22 +219,50 @@ impl StateResolution {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Returns a Vec of deduped EventIds that appear in some chains but not others.
|
||||
pub fn get_auth_chain_diff(
|
||||
pub fn get_auth_chain_diff<E, F>(
|
||||
_room_id: &RoomId,
|
||||
auth_event_ids: &[Vec<EventId>],
|
||||
) -> Result<BTreeSet<EventId>> {
|
||||
conflicting_state_sets: &[BTreeSet<EventId>],
|
||||
fetch_event: F,
|
||||
) -> Result<BTreeSet<EventId>>
|
||||
where
|
||||
E: Event,
|
||||
F: Fn(&EventId) -> Option<Arc<E>>,
|
||||
{
|
||||
let mut chains = vec![];
|
||||
|
||||
for ids in auth_event_ids {
|
||||
// Conflicted state sets are just some top level state events. Now we fetch the complete
|
||||
// auth chain of those events
|
||||
for ids in conflicting_state_sets {
|
||||
// TODO state store `auth_event_ids` returns self in the event ids list
|
||||
// when an event returns `auth_event_ids` self is not contained
|
||||
let chain = ids.iter().cloned().collect::<BTreeSet<_>>();
|
||||
chains.push(chain);
|
||||
let mut todo = ids.iter().map(|e| e.clone()).collect::<BTreeSet<_>>();
|
||||
let mut auth_chain_ids = ids.clone(); // we also return the events we started with
|
||||
|
||||
while let Some(event_id) = todo.iter().next().cloned() {
|
||||
if let Some(pdu) = fetch_event(&event_id) {
|
||||
todo.extend(
|
||||
pdu.auth_events()
|
||||
.clone()
|
||||
.into_iter()
|
||||
.collect::<BTreeSet<_>>()
|
||||
.difference(&auth_chain_ids)
|
||||
.cloned(),
|
||||
);
|
||||
auth_chain_ids.extend(pdu.auth_events().into_iter());
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
warn!("Could not find pdu mentioned in auth events.");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
todo.remove(&event_id);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
chains.push(auth_chain_ids);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if let Some(chain) = chains.first().cloned() {
|
||||
let rest = chains.iter().skip(1).flatten().cloned().collect();
|
||||
let common = chain.intersection(&rest).collect::<Vec<_>>();
|
||||
if let Some(first) = chains.first().cloned() {
|
||||
let common = chains
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.fold(first, |a, b| a.intersection(&b).cloned().collect::<BTreeSet<EventId>>());
|
||||
|
||||
Ok(chains.into_iter().flatten().filter(|id| !common.contains(&id)).collect())
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
|
@ -69,14 +69,6 @@ fn ban_with_auth_chains2() {
|
||||
&room_id(),
|
||||
&RoomVersionId::Version6,
|
||||
&state_sets,
|
||||
state_sets
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.map(|map| {
|
||||
store
|
||||
.auth_event_ids(&room_id(), &map.values().cloned().collect::<Vec<_>>())
|
||||
.unwrap()
|
||||
})
|
||||
.collect(),
|
||||
|id| ev_map.get(id).map(Arc::clone),
|
||||
) {
|
||||
Ok(state) => state,
|
||||
|
@ -258,14 +258,6 @@ fn test_event_map_none() {
|
||||
&room_id(),
|
||||
&RoomVersionId::Version2,
|
||||
&state_sets,
|
||||
state_sets
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.map(|map| {
|
||||
store
|
||||
.auth_event_ids(&room_id(), &map.values().cloned().collect::<Vec<_>>())
|
||||
.unwrap()
|
||||
})
|
||||
.collect(),
|
||||
|id| ev_map.get(id).map(Arc::clone),
|
||||
) {
|
||||
Ok(state) => state,
|
||||
|
@ -109,20 +109,10 @@ pub fn do_check(
|
||||
.collect::<Vec<_>>()
|
||||
);
|
||||
|
||||
let resolved = StateResolution::resolve(
|
||||
&room_id(),
|
||||
&RoomVersionId::Version6,
|
||||
&state_sets,
|
||||
state_sets
|
||||
.iter()
|
||||
.map(|map| {
|
||||
store
|
||||
.auth_event_ids(&room_id(), &map.values().cloned().collect::<Vec<_>>())
|
||||
.unwrap()
|
||||
})
|
||||
.collect(),
|
||||
|id| event_map.get(id).map(Arc::clone),
|
||||
);
|
||||
let resolved =
|
||||
StateResolution::resolve(&room_id(), &RoomVersionId::Version6, &state_sets, |id| {
|
||||
event_map.get(id).map(Arc::clone)
|
||||
});
|
||||
match resolved {
|
||||
Ok(state) => state,
|
||||
Err(e) => panic!("resolution for {} failed: {}", node, e),
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user